The GOP is not the Party of Lincoln - A Brief History. Part I: Whigged Beginnings

Note: Due to the length of the topic, this will be a multi-part post.


An iconic photograph of a bearded Abraham Lincoln showing his head and shoulders.

Alexander Gardner [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Back in June, a friend of mine said “I really think it's time for the Democrats to reclaim Lincoln from the Republican Party.” It was quickly pointed out that Lincoln was indeed a Republican [4], which is factually correct, but ignores the differences in the politics and policies of the Republican Party of the 1860s and the Republican Party of the 2010s. When looking at political parties of any era, especially when comparing parties of said eras, it is important to take into account the political realities of the time, the stances of the parties, the viewpoints of the members of the parties, and what the parties were voting for. For example, in my blog post about Minnesota’s voting history, I brought up that Minnesota overwhelmingly voted Progressive (Bull-Moose) in 1912 [1][6][9], while the Republicans had the majority in 1972 [2][7][9] and the Democrats in 2012 [8][9][10] - in each case, the candidate who won Minnesota happened to be the more progressive candidate. The same goes for Lincoln.

Depending on one’s point of view, the United States is currently either in the Fifth or Sixth Party System [Note 1][Note 2], however, Lincoln and the Republican Party of his era were in the Third Party System. As the Second Party System came to a close, the Whig Party was collapsing - slavery was a major issue that split the party. In the northeast, Whigs cared about national unity but didn’t care about slavery. In the north, Whigs thought that slavery was incompatible with the (then) modern economy. In the south, Whigs supported a strong textile industry and often found themselves aligned with the northeast as well as supported a stronger fugitive slave law. Anti-slavery Whigs and some Free-Soil Democrats joined together to fight the Kansas-Nebraska Act (the act that opened Kansas and Nebraska territories to slavery, repealing the Missouri Compromise) [21] [Note 3]. Eventually, the South attempted to secede from the Union, the Civil War was fought with a Union Victory, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was passed [20]. This was the period of the Republicans being the progressive party [Note 4].

This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1977 and without a copyright notice. Unless its author has been dead for several years, it is copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works, such as Canada (50 p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 p.m.a.), Mexico (100 p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties.

Like the Whigs before them, the Republican Party had factions: Radical Republicans [14][16][17], who wanted Blacks to have the same freedoms as Whites and to have harsh punishments for rebels; Moderate Republicans[14] (with Lincoln as their leader), who wanted to reintegrate the Confederate States back into the Union as quickly as possible, and the Conservative Republicans who opposed the Radical Republicans.

Enter the Fourth Party System. After Reconstruction happened in the south, Republican power waned as Democrats reasserted themselves in the Solid South. Great wealth has come to the North because the Republican leaders had become plutocrats - high tariffs and high spending, which did not help the southern plantations but was a boon for northern industries. Also, the Panic of 1893 [11][Note 5] led to a major Republican victory in the elections, which restored the confidence of businesses. The Republicans were seen as the friend of business, while still holding the mantle of being the progressive party. But this also caused friction within the party, as progressive members became concerned that party leaders and businesses were getting too comfortable with each other.

TO BE CONTINUED.


Note 1: To quote Wikipedia, “a party system is a concept in comparative political science concerning the system of government by political parties in a democratic country. The idea is that political parties have basic similarities: they control the government, have a stable base of mass popular support, and create internal mechanisms for controlling funding, information and nominations” [12] - that is to say, how many relevant parties there are, how fragmented they are, and how effective each party is defines a party system.

Note 2: The contention between whether we are in the Fifth or Sixth Party System comes from whether or not one sees the Civil Rights Era and the Reagan Era as a continuation of the New Deal or as separate events. Those who agree that we are in the Sixth Party System generally cannot agree when it began, however - either the Civil Rights Era or the Reagan Era was the beginning of the Sixth party System. 

Note 3: At this point, the American Civil War comes into play, after the election of President Lincoln. The short version is that the Southern States wanted to keep slaves, and the Northern States wanted to abolish slavery. I am not going to get into this, because the Civil War is a whole post of its own, with ties into current events (Klu Klux Klan, Neo-Nazis, the Criminal Justice System, and the events happening right now in Charlottesville, Virginia).

Probably a good idea.

This is not true. At all.

Note 4: During the 2016 election, there had been a meme going around indicating that the Republican Party was a third party, and that Abraham Lincoln was a third party candidate [3][18] - this is a fabrication supported by supporters of Gary Johnson of the Libertarian Party [18][19][22]. The third parties of the era were the Greenback Party [5], the Populist Party [13], and the Prohibition Party [15], while the main parties were the Democrats and Republicans.

Note 5: I am not going to get into the Panic of 1893 here, as that is another story unto itself. Here’s the short version: a wheat crop failure and a coup in Buenos Aires caused European investors to be concerned that problems might spread, causing them to make a run at US gold reserves in the US Treasury. This caused Grover Cleveland (D) to repeal the Sherman Silver Purchase Act, which caused people to run to the banks to withdraw their money, which caused bank runs. At the same time, there was a financial panic in London, a drop in European trade, and foreign investors selling American stocks to get gold. After banks closed, businesses failed, and farms shut down, a bunch of finger pointing happened and the Republicans swept the 1894 elections. [11]


If you like what you read here, and would like to show your support, please consider donating.

I am on Patreon to help fund the work that goes into maintaining a website and creating researched content. Also, it will give me some financial relief as I am also endeavoring to complete a number of science fiction and fantasy stories, and hopefully compile them into zines or collected works. As a sponsor, you'll get quality blog posts, early access to completed stories, and the knowledge that you are helping me fund the creative process. I will get the benefit of some stress reduction as I won't have to worry about finances as much anymore, and that will help me be free to create more work.

It's not always possible to sponsor on a monthly basis. If you would like to do a one time donation, please feel free to use PayPal or SquareCash. Producing content takes time and effort, and any support would be most appreciated. Your donations help me cover expenses and eventually will let me be able to create quality content full-time.


1. “1912 Presidential Election.” The American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showelection.php?year=1912. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017.

2. “1972 Presidential Election.” The American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showelection.php?year=1972. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017.

3. Anne, Libby. “Abraham Lincoln Was Not a Third Party Candidate.” Love, Joy, Feminism, Patheos, 26 Sept. 2016, www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2016/09/abraham-lincoln-was-not-a-third-party-candidate.html. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

4. Freidel, Frank, and Hugh Sidey. “Abraham Lincoln.” The White House, The United States Government, 8 Mar. 2017, www.whitehouse.gov/1600/presidents/abrahamlincoln. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017. The Presidential biographies on WhiteHouse.gov are from “The Presidents of the United States of America,” by Frank Freidel and Hugh Sidey. Copyright 2006 by the White House Historical Association.

5. “Greenback Party.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 7 Aug. 2017, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenback_Party. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

6. Leip, David. “1912 Presidential General Election Results - Minnesota.” Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections, uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=1912&fips=27&off=0&elect=0&f=0. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017.

7. Leip, David. “1972 Presidential General Election Results - Minnesota.” Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections, uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=1972&f=1&off=0&elect=0&fips=27&submit=Retrieve. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017.

8. Leip, David. “2012 Presidential General Election Results - Minnesota.” Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections, uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=2012&fips=27&off=0&elect=0&f=0. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017.

9. “Minnesota Elections: Dates and Vote Totals.” Election Results - Minnesota Legislative Reference Library, www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/mngov/electionresults. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017.

10. “MN Election Results.” Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State, electionresults.sos.state.mn.us/ENR/home/1. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017.

11. “Panic of 1893.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 14 Aug. 2017, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1893. Accessed 16 Aug. 2017.

12. “Party system.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 4 Aug. 2017, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_system. Accessed 12 Aug. 2017.

13. “People's Party (United States).” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 1 Aug. 2017, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Party_(United_States). Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

14. “Presidential and Congressional Reconstruction Plans - AP U.S. History Topic Outlines - Study Notes.” Study Notes, www.apstudynotes.org/us-history/topics/presidential-and-congressional-reconstruction-plans/. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

15. “Prohibition Party.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 7 Aug. 2017, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_Party. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

16. “Radical Reconstruction.” Ushistory.org, Independence Hall Association, www.ushistory.org/us/35b.asp. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

17. “Radical Republicans.” Ohio History Central, Ohio History Connection, www.ohiohistorycentral.org/w/Radical_Republicans. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

18. Rouner, Jef. “Dear Libertarians: Stop Saying Abraham Lincoln Was a Third Party Candidate.” Houston Press, 20 Oct. 2016, www.houstonpress.com/arts/dear-libertarians-stop-saying-abraham-lincoln-was-a-third-party-candidate-8713006. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

19. Stanley, T L. “Abe Lincoln Trashes Clinton and Trump in This Insane Ad for Libertarian Gary Johnson.” Adweek, Adweek, 29 Aug. 2016, www.adweek.com/creativity/abe-lincoln-trashes-clinton-and-trump-insane-ad-libertarian-gary-johnson-173174/. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017. Harmon Brothers strike again

20. “The Civil Rights Bill of 1866.” US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives, history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1851-1900/The-Civil-Rights-Bill-of-1866/. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

21. “The Origins of the Republican Party.” Ushistory.org, Independence Hall Association, www.ushistory.org/gop/origins.htm. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.

22. Wilson, J. “Johnson Super PAC's 'Dead Abe Lincoln' Video Is 2016's Most Viewed Ad.” A Libertarian Future, 15 Sept. 2016, alibertarianfuture.com/big-government/propaganda/johnson-super-pacs-dead-abe-lincoln-video-is-2016s-most-viewed-political-ad/. Accessed 13 Aug. 2017.